side note: I don’t want to rag on Hillary too much….we’re going to need a lot of her supporters come November…but I had to post this……this is what I try and talk to people about when we discuss Hillary. She has a wonderful circle of people defining her to the American people…but actions speak louder then words.
by Mark Karlin
Editor and Publisher
Buzzflash.com
Maybe we are naive, but we have always thought of progressivism — in its ideal form — as gender neutral. Men and women, people of all faiths and colors join together to promote the common good, peace and justice.
BuzzFlash has long championed the equality of people regardless of race, gender or religion.
So, as a male, it has taken me by surprise that so many avowed “Feminists” support Hillary Clinton merely because she has the anatomical features of a woman, when her policies and political style more closely mirror the more detestable side of “male” politics.
Does a true Feminist support “obliterating Iran”? Senator Clinton didn’t even discuss the complexities behind the whole notion of Iran hypothetically attacking Israel, an ally with enough nuclear capability to “obliterate” the entire Middle East on its own. In short, wasn’t it more Texas macho (think Bush and the Neo-Cons) for Clinton to offer her “obliterate” comment than reassuring Feminist diplomacy?
Wouldn’t it have been the more Feminist thing to do to answer by saying, “As leader of the strongest nation on earth I would look at every effort to prevent such an occurrence and I think that can be done through diplomatic means. Look, we survived decades of the cold war without a nuclear attack because we were patient and diplomatic. I believe that we can do the same in the Middle East.”
But, no, Hillary went Texan on us, and that’s not Feminist.
In fact, Mary Matalin’s uxorious husband, James Carville, boasted the other day that — and we are not making this up — if Hillary gave one of her three gonads to Barack Obama, they would each have two.
Now would a Feminist keep a high-testosterone male chauvinist clown like that on her staff?
Of course, wouldn’t a Feminist have read the NIE before authorizing Bush to proceed with the Iraq War?
Wouldn’t a Feminist have voted for the banning of cluster bombs in civilian areas, instead of for their continued use in populated communities, where they particularly kill children?
Wouldn’t a Feminist be supporting MoveOn.org’s anti-war work and party activists for peace instead of denouncing them as extemists?
Would a Feminist have stood by and said nothing during the slaughter in Rwanda?
Would a Feminist have sat back and let the Bush Administration run roughshod through our civil liberties? (more…)





Eight thousand pages of documents related to the Pentagon’s illegal propaganda campaign, known as the Pentagon military analyst program, are now online for the world to see, although in a format that makes it impossible to easily search them and therefore difficult to read and dissect. This trove includes the documents pried out of the Pentagon by David Barstow and used as the basis for his stunning investigation that appeared in the New York Times on April 20, 2008.
Spent & Approved War-Spending - About $600 billion of US taxpayers’ funds. President Bush has requested about $200 billion more for 2008, which would bring the cumulative total to close to $800 billion.
It’s a train wreck waiting to happen, with one candidate claiming to be the nominee while the other vigorously denies it, all predicated on an argument over what exactly constitutes the finish line of the primary race.
No point denying it: Barack Obama has a Jewish problem. Because of his sympathy for the Palestinians, his willingness to meet with enemies, perhaps even his Arabic middle name, he averaged ten or more percentage points worse among Jewish voters in New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania than he did in those states overall. And then there’s been the ongoing Reverend Wright saga, tossing gasoline on the whole situation. Still, come November, simple demographics suggest that his “Jewish problem” will be significantly less problematic in the general election.
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (CBS13) ― In this tight battle for the democratic nomination we’ve heard a lot about the candidates courting super-delegates.
On April 17 2008 US Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) introduced two bills addressing the federal penalties for marijuana possession and the use of medical marijuana. The first decriminalization bill introduced in Congress for the last 24 years.